Compare
Viedoc vs Harbor
Viedoc gives clinical teams direct control over study configuration and amendments. Harbor automates more of the work inside the study, turning protocols into study drafts and source documents into reviewed CRF data.
How much work should your EDC take on?
Viedoc gives clinical teams flexible study configuration and amendments. Harbor combines that control with automation across study build, source data entry, and monitoring.
Automated study work
Harbor automates source data entry and monitoring across the study, with Magic Build helping the team start from the protocol.
Less manual entry
Magic Capture turns source documents into reviewed CRF data while preserving the evidence behind each value.
Source-linked monitoring
Monitors can review source and CRF data together, with queries, audit history, and SDV status attached to the field.
Configuration model
Harbor
Magic Build turns a protocol PDF into a reviewable study draft. The team can refine the draft, generate editable source and eCRF documents, and run full UAT in Harbor.Viedoc
Viedoc gives study teams a browser-based Designer, administration tools, reporting, and adjacent eClinical products.What it means
Viedoc gives the team direct control inside the designer. Harbor automates the starting point and more of the work during the study.Study build
Harbor
Magic Build starts from the protocol PDF and produces a reviewable study draft. Harbor also generates editable DOCX eCRF and source packages from the live study structure.Viedoc
Viedoc supports drag-and-drop study design, reusable templates, and in-house study administration.What it means
Compare the work required to turn the protocol into a validated study, the review artifacts, and UAT.Source data workflow
Harbor
Magic Capture can orient and group source-document pages by subject and form, extract values with original text, page references, bounding boxes, confidence, and reasoning, then save reviewed results directly into eCRFs.Viedoc
Viedoc collects site-entered data through EDC forms and supports ePRO, file upload, queries, review, lock, SDV, and integrations.What it means
Harbor automates the path from source document to reviewed CRF data. Viedoc's standard workflow starts with data entry into the form.Monitoring and SDV
Harbor
Monitors open the source document beside the CRF field, verify the extracted value, review its audit history, raise a query, and record SDV status from the same data point.Viedoc
Viedoc supports SDV, data review, clinical review, query handling, dashboards, metrics, reports, and lock workflows.What it means
Harbor keeps source evidence beside the CRF field during review. Compare that workflow with Viedoc's review, SDV, query, dashboard, and reporting tools.Amendments
Harbor
Study versions, testing/live states, stable IDs, and upgraded event-form previews help teams inspect how existing subject data maps into a new version before promotion.Viedoc
Viedoc lets study teams configure and amend studies in its Designer.What it means
Viedoc gives the study team direct control over amendments. Harbor adds version review and a carry-forward preview before promotion.Closeout
Harbor
Harbor enforces capture completion, blocks CRF signing while queries remain open, requires signed CRFs before database lock, and exports study data as CSV, JSON, or subject PDFs.Viedoc
Viedoc supports reporting, signatures, exports, review, and lock within its EDC workflow.What it means
Compare the final checklist, evidence package, exports, signatures, and archive work with the people who own closeout.Advanced workflows
Harbor
Harbor includes patient-reported events, scheduled reminders, encrypted stratified randomization lists, MedDRA coding, field validations, auto queries, and signed audit-log digests.Viedoc
Viedoc offers adjacent products for ePRO, tele-visits, reporting, coding, randomization, and trial supply management.What it means
Viedoc's adjacent products matter when the study needs them. Harbor's automation changes the work inside the core study workflow.Compliance and validation
Harbor
Harbor supports regulated clinical studies with audit trails, role-based access, electronic signatures, database lock, HIPAA-ready controls, 21 CFR Part 11 support, and validation documentation available.Viedoc
Viedoc also supports regulated clinical research with HIPAA-ready controls, 21 CFR Part 11 support, audit trails, electronic signatures, and validation documentation available.What it means
Both platforms can support regulated clinical studies. The choice is about workflow fit, implementation effort, and how evidence is surfaced during monitoring and closeout.Where Harbor works best.
Harbor fits when the team wants automation during data entry and monitoring, with source evidence available beside the CRF field.
Choose Harbor when
- The team wants a reviewable study draft from the protocol instead of building every structure by hand.
- Sites will work from PDFs, scans, labs, or EHR printouts and the team wants reviewed values to enter the CRF with source evidence attached.
- Monitors need source and CRF data together during review.
Choose Viedoc when
- The team already has experience building and running studies in Viedoc.
- The study needs Viedoc's adjacent eClinical products or self-service configuration model.
- The study is primarily direct capture and source-document review adds little operational burden.
Worth reviewing
- Ask Viedoc to show the work a study builder owns from protocol interpretation through configuration and UAT.
- Use representative source packets to compare manual entry, extraction review, field evidence, SDV, queries, and reporting.
- Walk through an amendment, signatures, exports, archive materials, and database-lock prerequisites.
Let's talk about your study.
Bring your protocol, source workflow, monitoring plan, and closeout requirements. We'll walk through how the study would run in Harbor and answer the questions your team is weighing.